DUI's: What qualifies as a vehicle?

DUI’s have been in the news lately, especially with what seems absurd charges like a DUI on a horse!  One might wonder what qualifies as a vehicle? Can a person get a DUI on a horse? What about a bicycle? What about a golf cart?

The Florida DUI statute states that in order for a person to be found guilty of a DUI, the person must be found to be driving or in actual physical control of a vehicle.  We can discuss “actual physical control” in another blog post, as our purposes here are to define “vehicle.” 

So what is a “vehicle”.  Florida statute defines a vehicle as “every device in, upon, or by which any person or property is or may be transported or drawn upon a highway, except personal delivery devices and devices used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks.”  By this definition a vehicle is any device by which a person or property may be transported.  Devices are manmade.  They are objects.  This definition of a vehicle, which does not include having any sort of motor or engine, allows bicycles to be included in the definition of a vehicle.  Therefore, a person can be found guilty of a DUI on a bicycle.  You can also be found guilty of a DUI on a golf cart, or any other type of device that fits the definition of a vehicle.

That brings us to a horse.  As a defense attorney, I would argue first that the horse is a mammal and not a device.  Therefore, a horse does not fit the definition of a vehicle.  Next, there is an exception within the Motor Vehicle statutes for “animals and animal-drawn vehicles” that allows them to be treated as pedestrians.  Finally within the statute, it states that whenever sidewalks are not provided, pedestrians can walk on the shoulder of a highway on the left side facing traffic. As there are no precedent horse DUI cases that I can find, this particular case should be interesting. 


If you have been charged with a DUI, you need an aggressive attorney by your side.  Call Heather Bryan Law, at 863-825-5309, for your consultation, or contact us online.

Popular posts from this blog

But the pot was not in my possession!?

I hear this all of the time.  Under Florida law , there is actual and constructive possession. Actual possession is when the illicit drugs are on your person.  In other words, the drugs are in your pocket, in your sock, or in your hand.  Actual possession is an easier case for the State to prosecute.  There may still be issues with a warrant or a stop that can lead to a suppression of evidence. Constructive possession is where it gets tricky.  Constructive possession means a person exercised control over a substance.  Mere proximity does not establish intentional control.  In order to prove "possession" the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant 1) knew of the existence of the drugs and 2) intentionally exercised control over the drugs. Let's take the following scenario.  You are the passenger in a car with a friend.  You are sitting in the front, passenger seat. Unbeknownst to you, there is a make-up bag under...
Read more

False Confessions

There are only 24 states that require police interrogations to be recorded from start to end, and Florida is not one of them.  Not recording the entirety of a police interrogation is a problem, especially considering that in over 25% of wrongful convictions that have been overturned by DNA evidence, the Defendant made false confessions to law enforcement during the interrogation.  Why do people make false confessions?   Most people believe that they would most certainly not confess to a crime that they did not commit.  However, studies show that under the conditions of an interrogation, false confessions are a huge problem that cannot be overlooked.  Law enforcement officers often give details to crimes leading suspects in the direction that they wish him or her to go.  For example, the officer may tell the suspect that he knows he used a shovel.  He knows he used a shovel to hit him.  And he hit him in the head.  He hit him in ...
Read more

What is Resisting An Officer Without Violence?

If you live in Polk County you have probably seen the video circulating social media of the gentleman that was supposedly resisting arrest by Lakeland police officers and therefore force was used against him.   According to the chief, that force was necessary because the gentleman was “ actively resisting ” and his resistance was even “ violent .”   This video has caused an array of opinions whether the officers’ response was justified.   What one must question is what exactly is resisting an officer without violence?   And what exactly what must one do to get charged with this crime?   Florida Statute section 843.02 defines resisting an officer without violence as resisting, obstructing, or opposing any officer in the lawful execution of their legal duty, without offering or doing violence.   I am sure that clears things up!   Therein lies the problem.   An officer just has to say that a person is opposing him or obstructing him in so...
Read more