What is Pretrial Diversion?

Pretrial Diversion programs are available usually only to first time offenders to resolve their cases and successful completion results in the State dropping the charges.  The qualifications for these programs do differ from county to county. 

First and foremost, the crime the defendant is accused of usually must be a misdemeanor.  In Polk County, the most common charges that defendants are offered diversion for are possession of cannabis, driving while license suspended or revoked, and domestic violence battery.  The second qualification is that the defendant must not have been found guilty of a prior offense. 

Diversion usually consists of an evaluation and some sort of counseling, depending upon the charge.  It might even consist of drug testing.  The defendant must pay for the diversion program and all related testing.  The program takes anywhere from a couple of months to about 6 months. 
If the defendant can meet the qualifications of the diversion program and successfully complete the diversion program, the State Attorney’s Office will drop the charges. 


For a person who has never been in trouble and wants to avoid a trial, diversion is an excellent option.  Contact Heather Bryan Law online or call 863-825-5309, today for your consultation.
Location: Lakeland, FL, USA

Popular posts from this blog

False Confessions

There are only 24 states that require police interrogations to be recorded from start to end, and Florida is not one of them.  Not recording the entirety of a police interrogation is a problem, especially considering that in over 25% of wrongful convictions that have been overturned by DNA evidence, the Defendant made false confessions to law enforcement during the interrogation.  Why do people make false confessions?   Most people believe that they would most certainly not confess to a crime that they did not commit.  However, studies show that under the conditions of an interrogation, false confessions are a huge problem that cannot be overlooked.  Law enforcement officers often give details to crimes leading suspects in the direction that they wish him or her to go.  For example, the officer may tell the suspect that he knows he used a shovel.  He knows he used a shovel to hit him.  And he hit him in the head.  He hit him in the head over and over.  This goes on for ho
Read more

But the pot was not in my possession!?

I hear this all of the time.  Under Florida law , there is actual and constructive possession. Actual possession is when the illicit drugs are on your person.  In other words, the drugs are in your pocket, in your sock, or in your hand.  Actual possession is an easier case for the State to prosecute.  There may still be issues with a warrant or a stop that can lead to a suppression of evidence. Constructive possession is where it gets tricky.  Constructive possession means a person exercised control over a substance.  Mere proximity does not establish intentional control.  In order to prove "possession" the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant 1) knew of the existence of the drugs and 2) intentionally exercised control over the drugs. Let's take the following scenario.  You are the passenger in a car with a friend.  You are sitting in the front, passenger seat. Unbeknownst to you, there is a make-up bag underneath your seat with .5 grams
Read more

What is Resisting An Officer Without Violence?

If you live in Polk County you have probably seen the video circulating social media of the gentleman that was supposedly resisting arrest by Lakeland police officers and therefore force was used against him.   According to the chief, that force was necessary because the gentleman was “ actively resisting ” and his resistance was even “ violent .”   This video has caused an array of opinions whether the officers’ response was justified.   What one must question is what exactly is resisting an officer without violence?   And what exactly what must one do to get charged with this crime?   Florida Statute section 843.02 defines resisting an officer without violence as resisting, obstructing, or opposing any officer in the lawful execution of their legal duty, without offering or doing violence.   I am sure that clears things up!   Therein lies the problem.   An officer just has to say that a person is opposing him or obstructing him in some way, and he can charge that person w
Read more